When the Labor Party objected, they slammed the ruling Conservative government to spend up to £500 million a year on management and IT systems consultants. They shouted, "This is a shameful waste of taxpayers' money and money - should be spent on first-line services such as hospitals and schools," rather than handing them over to a few wealthy advisers. Now that the New Labour Party is in power, they seem to have changed their minds. However, the New Labour Party not only spends £500 million a year on consultants – their plans go far beyond that. In their ambitious plans to modernize public services, they seem to have abandoned the civil service and decided to develop new policies and implement them with their favorite management and IT systems consultants. This is actually an expensive job - it will cost us more than 70 billion pounds taxpayers - more than 20 billion pounds for management consultants, at least another 500 pounds for IT system consultants
The large number of taxpayers who hand over funds to consultants can be seen as evidence of a vibrant, forward-looking government investment in national modernization. At the very least, the success of these large-scale investments will be positive. However, the experience so far is not optimistic. Judging from what has happened, the New Labour Party's investment in management and IT systems consulting seems to be just a series of unfinished and shameful disasters. The situation is so bad that in a party committee of the whole party, the British government is criticized for both wasting taxpayers and wasting taxpayers. Money and trying to cover up the truth about its poor financial management. The committee concluded that the British government's record on IT consulting projects was an alarming waste of public money, while Whitehall tried to hide the hidden secrets of business secrets. There are many opponents, such as child support agencies - a waste of 1 billion pounds of consultants, the National Offenders Administration - about 300 million pounds of waste and the Ministry of Defense - at least 500 million pounds spent on consulting, absolutely no results. The most shameful project for everyone must be the new NHS IT system, which takes three years to complete, costing only £2.3 billion – actually takes 10 years to achieve, costing more than £12 billion, or even failing to function properly.
This is a moral, not just a manager, the problem
Management and IT systems consulting is the enterprise. As a company, their goal is to maximize profits. This means they must sell as many products as possible at the highest possible price. Just like any other business - manufacturers of soft drinks, breakfast cereals, photocopiers, paper clips, cars, hamburgers, cigarettes or anything else. When you sell management or IT systems consulting to another commercial company [such as a bank, insurance company or oil company], you are playing a commercial game where you know the rules. You can get as much money as possible by thinking about the "necessary". You can sell services and new IT systems and charge them in ways that you think can be escaped. As we all know, this is how the business works. In any case, most banks, insurance companies and oil companies are very wasteful bureaucracies that have more money than they know.
However, I have spent more than 20 years selling consulting services to many companies and government agencies, and I believe this will change when profit-producing companies like consulting firms sell services to public sector organizations. . Because here, every 100 million people are introduced to management and IT systems consulting companies. The pocket means that the cost of providing basic services in areas such as health, defense, schools, social services and police has been reduced by $100 million. Therefore, if a management consulting firm knows to sell a project, in a government department or other department, it will arrange 20 to 30 inexperienced consultants. When there are two or three experienced consultants, it can be faster and cheaper. You must ask this question when you complete the project. This is just a good thing, or whether the consulting company may be accused of being unethical. Similarly, if an IT systems consulting firm manages to convince the government that it should spend £400 million to build a brand new IT system, it knows that existing systems can easily be upgraded to less than £40 million – a case study Is the company a savvy businessman or a closer to the theft of public funds? In addition, if these consultations systematically impose excessive consultant fees on the government. Time, fictitious management bill, collects the full cost of travel expenses from the government, while retaining the rebate of the travel company, and allows the government to pay the time consultant and its managers for expenses spent on internal consulting activities - again, this is just a smart business or fraud Sexually ripped off?
There is another aspect to the ethical issue of public sector consultation. If the consulting company or system provider fails to meet the results of the private company's commitment, no one will be hurt. However, if inexperienced junior consultants set a goalless goal for health services, resulting in a closure of the ward and a reduction in the number of patients treated. Or, if the consulting firm creates a disastrous IT system for the government, because they don't have a passport to stop people from traveling because their application can't be processed, more than 176,000 immigrants are in trouble, which prevents the court from prosecuting the offender, causing family members to lose their homes or Putting tens of thousands of low-income families into poverty, it seems reasonable for the ethical issues of consulting firms that are willing to accept cash, but it does not seem to be entirely due to all the pain caused by their incompetence and greed.
Australian people are not stupid
At a recent dinner, I sat next to a still unknown gentleman. He has a title and has served as a professor at a business school, a director of the Bank of England, a member of the Central Cabinet Office of the former Cabinet Office ["Think Tank" #39;], a Treasury Director and a Major Bank Director. I started talking to him about my concern about the number of taxpayers. The money was handed over to the consultant and a series of disasters that followed. Then I suggested that the government be taken away because its consultant fees were very expensive. The gentleman looked at me contemptuously and said contemptuously, "I found your arguments wrong, lacking rigorous thoughts - the Treasury and the Bank of England are not stupid."
Seeing so many consulting companies selling to so many government departments, these departments have almost no ridiculous results. I wrote a book about how management and IT system consultants pay to put their magic into action. The story of what really happened in practice. Public sector organization. Now, taxpayers can make their own ideas about the petitions of the Bank of England, the Treasury and other 2,500 government departments or others who have made generous contributions to the welfare of already wealthy management and IT systems consultants. The number is unbelievable.
Orignal From: New Labour Party is consulting crazy
No comments:
Post a Comment